An extended Test series of 4 – 5 matches, that rare event in today’s crowded international calendar, serves as a great illustration of a cricketer’s or cricket team’s ebbs and flows in fortune. There is sufficient time for a storyline to develop, several, in fact. One batsman emerges as a bulwark for his team, another finds he can’t score a run to save his life, a bowler discovers a new bunny, strengths and weaknesses are compared, patterns emerge. Sometimes, when the pattern becomes obvious pretty early on, the rest of the series just grinds on remorselessly to the obvious conclusion, demonstrating how cruel the Test arena can be with no place to hide. As it was with the India-England Test series.
This was a highly awaited series between two evenly matched sides at the top of the rankings, but it ended up as one of the most lop-sided in recent times. To be honest, they were never evenly matched, but no one knew that to begin with, and hence the initial matches had more than a semblance of a contest, with both teams playing in ignorance of the other’s relative strengths and weaknesses. But once they realised the gulf between the two teams, the Indian team fell away disastrously, and there was just no coming back. And the increasingly divergent paths taken by the two teams through the series was watched with a sense of incredulity, irrespective of who you were supporting.
1st Test, Lords: Teams ranked 1 and 2 are fighting it out, with 2 playing host. There’s excitement in the air, the series is too close to call, and the teams oblige by playing some hard-fought cricket. The partnership between Broad and Prior in the England second innings turns out to be pivotal, proving to be the difference between a target of 460 and a target of 340. Even the latter might have been too much for India, but that rubbing-your-nose-in partnership provides some much needed momentum for England.
2nd Test, Nottingham: England have been the better side in the first side, but the series is still balanced. India has a recent history of always playing catch-up and playing it well, say the experts. So the world waits and watches. And we watch open-mouthed as India actually seems to turn it on, taking a first innings lead with 6 wickets in hand. This is really champaigne stuff, we begin telling ourselves. Till Broad runs in to take a devastating hat-trick, and keep the Indian lead down to 67. For me, the hat-trick was the key event in the entire series, given the match circumstances and the stage of the series it came in. And a hat-trick, almost by definition, seems to be always associated with a winning side, providing that enormous boost in team morale and confidence. How many hat-tricks have been taken in a losing cause, I wonder? The England batsmen immediately follow it up with the first of what would be a recurring feature in the series – a 500 plus score, and a pattern begins to emerge.
3rd Test, Edgbaston: Saurav Ganguly’s confidence in the Indian team coming back to square the series 2-2 begins to sound like one of his erstwhile team pep talks, rather than the balanced view of a cricket analyst. But the determined Indian fan continues to watch with hope in his heart, only to see his worst nightmare come true. The batsmen are worked over, the bowlers look club-level, the fielders look insipid, the freshly arrived Sehwag gathers a king pair, and India crashes to a defeat by an innings and a whopping margin. It’s hard and brutal Test cricket, with only one team in the match right through. We realise the concept of ‘key moments’ no longer apply to this series, because one way traffic has commenced. An interesting aspect is the lack of runs from Dravid in this match, the only match with meagre returns for him, in a series which he otherwise dominated. And this might be the truest, and saddest, picture painted of Dravid’s immense contribution to the series. For all his batting heroics and commendable pride shown right through, his exploits only served to lessen the margin of defeats for India, nothing else. And that is just a statement on the nature of the game, and not on the individual brilliance he exhibited all through the series, except Edgbaston.
4th Test, The Oval: Do we really need to extend this farce, seems to be the predominant thought. At least, the Indians seem to think so, jaded in their mind, and exposed by the cruelty of Test cricket. They plod on, Dravid continues to dig in, Bell makes perhaps the easiest double hundred ever, and even rain intervening for a major portion of one day cannot stop England from completing another innings defeat. Tendulkar comes within 9 runs of completing ‘that’ landmark, which thankfully will now not be remembered as having been achieved in one of the worst Test series for India ever. Small mercy! Team 1 slips to 3, while looking far worse. Team 2 moves up to 1. England are surprised at the margin, but delighted. India are just tired, and relieved it’s all over.
Things can change dramatically in a Test series which spans across months. Drastic momentum shifts happen, perspectives change, reputations are made and lost, rankings are squandered and attained. During the second Test, commentator Ravi Shastri made an ill-advised remark on how England were jealous of India’s No.1 ranking, which led to a minor furore of its own. A couple of years down the line, it’ll be hard to imagine this kind of comment was made in the middle of a humiliating 0-4 whitewash of India. It’s been that kind of series.




